New options in the treatment of pathogenic substances

Marcel Riffel, Naturopath, Ostfildern, Germany

Dear Colleagues, dear Brugemann family, and dear friends of BICOM® bioresonance therapy.

In my presentation this year I would like to draw on the research carried out by Dr William Ross Adey and Dr rer. nat. Wolfgang Ludwig and incorporate this in my deliberations.

Dr William Ross Adey, a professor of anatomy and physiology born in Australia, developed the concept of the “ADEY window” or “biological window”.

A biological window describes a confined spectrum of electromagnetic oscillations, which are “recognised” by the organism thereby triggering a positive physiological reaction.

The discovery of this “biological window” has been very important in the science of energy medicine in terms of substantiating its efficacy.

Part of Adey’s research included experiments on the brain cells of hares and chicks where he applied technically generated impulses to the cells. Here he discovered not just that brain cells only respond to a quite specific technically produced frequency but also that they only respond at a quite specific intensity too.

Above or below this intensity there is no reaction whatsoever.

This experiment and similar ones disprove the assertion that: “If strong signals have no effect, then weak ones certainly won’t“.

Dr rer. nat. Wolfgang Ludwig (24 August 1927-28 March 2004), a biophysicist, with a degree in mathematics and physics and additional studies in physical chemistry, he worked for Regumed for a number of years and later as a freelancer with the company.

From 1964-67 he wrote his medical thesis at the University of Freiburg in Breisgau on the topic of “The influence of electromagnetic signals on the nervous system”.

Dr Ludwig contributed a series of important research papers which helped underpin the biophysical basis of bioresonance therapy.

On many occasions he would present the following definition during seminars on BICOM® bioresonance therapy:

“ADEY discovered through experimentation that stronger or strong signals can sometimes achieve a lesser effect on biological systems than weaker or weak signals. In fact, there is a “biological window” through which you have to gain entry to the regulation system in order to be able to carry out therapy particularly effectively. The “ADEY window” represents the entire range within which the body’s own signals may be amplified or attenuated”.

“Within this biological window there are further ‘bullseye panes’ through which the biological system can be reached particularly effectively following individual patient testing.

The signals of bioresonance therapy all lie within the Adey window, i.e. our therapy lies within this biological window, something which can be demonstrated and confirmed through the great many outstanding therapy successes achieved to date.

The body’s responsiveness can be improved further within the Adey window if you customise the optimum bandpass frequency and the optimum amplification stage to the patient’s individual circumstances. To achieve this without having to try out each and every bandpass frequency and amplification, the continuous bandpass was developed with the continuous amplification sweep.

The frequency sweep and the amplification sweep were assigned to all basic therapies in 2000. All of you will have observed no doubt that an improvement in a patient’s general health can be achieved with basic therapy alone using frequency and amplification sweeps to achieve energy balance.

Since the body reacts to signals in fractions of a second, this means that the sweeps repeatedly run through the frequency range and amplification stage which are those most suited for an individual patient and his/her current state of health.

The idea now is to automatically adjust the optimum resonances of the bandpass frequency and the amplification — i.e. without having to test – more precisely and more thoroughly to each individual patient. This can be achieved with an automatic sweep scanning all amplifications from 0.025 to 64-fold at each frequency stage and in reverse so that all relevant frequency stages are scanned within each amplification stage.

The underlying aim of my thinking therefore was to target within the ADEY window  the “bullseye panes” too in order to achieve an even better therapeutic outcome.

In other words, targeting the precisely defined spectrum of frequency and intensity (amplification stage) within which man’s biological system is particularly receptive.

In this way the patient’s individual resonance phenomenon is greatly intensified.

But let us first of all clarify the term “pathogenic substances”. By this I mean all substances that are stressful to patients, i.e. allergens, viruses, fungi, parasites, heavy metals, drugs … All these substances are treated preferably with an “Ai” or a “Di” program.

To show you that up to now we have had no programs for therapy (detoxification) of pathogenic substances within BICOM® bioresonance therapy which target the so- called bullseye panes within the ADEY window, I would now like to compare a number of existing therapy programs that you will have used in your work successfully on a daily basis and which I too have used successfully for years in my own practice.

As you will see, we have very many highly effective allergy programs (programs for the treatment of pathogenic substances) which, it is true, all fall within the biological window / ADEY window, yet do not cause the optimum frequency stage to also coincide with the optimum amplification stage.

Another motivating factor for me with respect to the subject of this presentation is the fact that to date no programs have been developed for treating allergies and pathogenic substances in the low deep frequency range.

 low deep frequency range

This fact led me to the following ideas which I believe represent a major improvement in the therapy of pathogenic substances.

Low deep frequencies

A bandpass runs from 1 Hz-25 Hz.
This bandpass runs through 250 frequency stages from 1 Hz to 25 Hz in increments of 0.1 Hz.
Up to now the frequency sweep rate in the low deep frequencies could be increased up to a maximum 240 seconds.
In the small bandpass (low deep frequencies) the frequency sweep rate is the time needed for the cursor to move from 1 Hz-25 Hz.
At a frequency sweep rate of 240 seconds and a total 250 frequency stages, this equates to 0.96 seconds for each frequency stage, i.e. for each 0.1 Hz.

  • At a frequency sweep rate of 300 seconds and a total 250 frequency stages, this equates to 1.2 seconds for each frequency stage, i.e. for each 0.1 Hz.
    At a frequency sweep rate of 600 seconds and a total 250 frequency stages, this equates to 2.4 seconds for each frequency stage, i.e. for each 0.1 Hz.
  • It should be possible to raise the frequency sweep rate to at least 600 seconds since at a frequency sweep rate of 600 seconds this equates to 2.4 seconds for each frequency stage, i.e. for each 0.1 Hz. If the amplification sweep rate is now 2.4 seconds (increasing amplification sweep), then for program types Ai or Di all the relevant amplifications (from 0.025—to 64), would coincide with the corresponding frequency stage (each 0.1 Hz stage). The total duration of treatment would be 10 minutes.

Normal frequencies

A bandpass runs from 10 Hz-152 kHz
– This bandpass runs through 2852
3a6ad78c0309cf0e350803ec1f734f80–  In the large bandpass (normal frequencies), the frequency sweep rate is the time needed for the cursor to move from 10 Hz-152 kHz and back to 10 Hz again.
Even if the frequency sweep rate were increased to 999 seconds, only 0.56 seconds would be available for each frequency stage.

–  For this reason, in order to hit the bullseye panes of the ADEY window we have to use the amplification stages.

–  The BICOM BICOM optima® has 103 different amplification stages in the program types Ai and Di

a55c710c957bd51f0603098e60c817ae–  For the sake of simplicity let’s work initially on the basis of 100 amplification stages.
–  The easiest method is to enter only a short frequency sweep time (3 seconds) and multiply this by the 100 amplification stages. This gives the program running time for the increasing or decreasing amplification sweep. For a symmetrical amplification sweep this would be halved.

With a frequency sweep rate of 3 seconds the cursor moves from 10 Hz-152 kHz and back again in 3 seconds. If you now select the decreasing amplification sweep (64-0.025 for Ai and Di) and an amplification sweep rate of 100 seconds, then each frequency stage meets the corresponding amplification stage twice. After 3 seconds the device switches to the next lowest amplification stage. The program running time results from multiplying the frequency sweep rate (3 seconds) by the number of amplification stages (100). This results in a therapy duration of 5 minutes.

After some thought I then accessed yet another program. The idea is that both the bullseye panes within the ADEY window are reached as well as therapy being administered for an adequate time for all the amplification stages being treated.

For this reason the idea was to take a therapy program with no bandpass (all frequencies) and to select a rate of 600 seconds for 103 amplifications stages and a decreasing amplification sweep (corresponding to a therapy duration of 10 minutes). This would mean that for each amplification stage there would be an additional therapy time of 5.83 seconds.

This would result then in new program series for treating allergens and/or pathogenic substances.

Program proposals for pathogenic stresses in the BICOM BICOM optima®

Program proposals for pathogenic stresses in the BICOM BICOM optima®


(Could for example be used for the CTT ampoules — degenerated cells, teeth or environmental toxins).

In my opinion this procedure does not lend itself so well to the 5 element CU ampoules or the “pink stabilising and trigger ampoules”. It would work of course, but I would prefer to use these in Channel 2.

pink stabilising and trigger ampoules

If you are able to carry out testing you can check whether the decreasing or the increasing amplification sweep is needed for each of the above programs. This may vary.


Procedure in practice

In our practice we have already carried out almost 300 such treatments. When administering therapy we proceed as follows.

The first therapy session includes a sufficiently lengthy basic therapy, stabilisation of the eliminating organs and treatment of scars and geopathic interference fields.

In the second session we begin with treatment of pathogenic substances. At the same time we adhere to the following sequence. Firstly Candida stresses, then central allergens, then viruses / bacteria / parasites / heavy metals / — depending on the priority test. All our patients adhere to abstention rules where therapy requires this.

After the second session stabilisation of the eliminating organs takes priority, followed by indication-based follow-up programs and treatment of intracellular stresses (Dr. Rauch’s program)

Treatment of intracellular stresses, low deep frequencies, Sabine Rauch

(H+Di / 3.6 Hz / wobble YES / continuous mode / sym. amplification sweep Di = 15 / amplification sweep rate 50 sec / 8 min)

Treatment of intracellular stresses, low deep frequencies

and finally the treatment of the pathogenic substance. Depending on test results, this is treated with either Ai or Di.

Once all the pathogenic substances are processed, these are checked in the last session. A re-test takes place. This test again checks against the 5 element ampoules from the CTT set and then all the pathogenic substances.

The pathogenic substances are checked using the tensor by means of the BICOM® (program 170 or 191) and verified by kinesiology. If a substance tests as kinesiologically stable, then it is provoked. (Program 196, A = 50-fold amplification — information is conducted to the mat and it is tested again by kinesiology.

If the pathogenic substance now tests as kinesiologically weak, then all the amplification stages (either on Ai or Di) are checked from 64 —0.025 with the biotensor. This test takes places as a resonance test between the patient and the plate with an Ai or Di program without bandpass (example: program 998). If an amplification stage tests positive, (resonance response between patient and plate), then a note is made of this.

The amplification stages that test positive are each treated subsequently for 4 minutes using the programs listed below, with either Ai or Di.

Subsequent therapy of individual amplification stages for allergies/ pathogens in the low deep frequencies.

Subsequent treatment Ai:

Ai 240 sec frequency sweep rate / continuous mode / Ai = 8 (set corresponding amplification) / 4 min

Subsequent treatment Di:

Di 240 sec frequency sweep rate / continuous mode / Di = 8 (set corresponding amplification) / 4 min

Observations in practice

Since I have been testing this programs, I have often been able to stabilise many pathogenic substances with BRT and these have also tested as stable following provocation in kinesiology too. In other words, no subsequent treatment with Ai or Di programs was needed.

Highly stressful pathogenic substances still tend to test positive for 1 up to a maximum of 4 amplification stages. As a rule, 2 to 3 amplification stages require subsequent treatment.

Before I began working with these new programs, there were often as many as 7 or 8 amplification stages requiring subsequent treatment. At that time I would treat pathogenic substances with programs 963 / 944 / 998 / 191 or 193, sometimes over the course of several weeks.

I can therefore say, based on my observations, that this type of therapy is efficient, fast (time-saving) and often proves promising after just a single treatment session. Also I observed no overreactions during therapy on the many patients I have with an autoimmune disorder or suffering from severe allergies. For my tumour patients I use the “degenerated cells” test set and treat the tested ampoules with the “Stabilising A” program series.

Requirements and options for use

Of course pathogenic substances can only be identified by means of a bioenergy test procedure. But a paediatrician too could carry out a throat swab for streptococci and give the mother a choice of antibiotics or bioresonance therapy with an Ai program series.

A child running a temperature of 41° was treated on a Saturday evening for streptococci and the very next morning the temperature was down to 38.5°. Amazing.

I hope I have given you enough information and made you feel enthusiastic about my approach, and I look forward to positive feedback from you all.

Kind regards Marcel Riffel

pdf download button